urumomo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2013
- Messages
- 6,842
Well , that's his assessment .
Gas turbine wouldn't cut it at that tonnage .
Turbine electric maybe . Best to stick to steam turbines - either the old oil-fired or a nuke plant .
I'm guessing with tool-up and cost overruns the first one would end up costing 38 billion , lol
Gas turbine wouldn't cut it at that tonnage .
Turbine electric maybe . Best to stick to steam turbines - either the old oil-fired or a nuke plant .
I'm guessing with tool-up and cost overruns the first one would end up costing 38 billion , lol