Not terrible. I think 1/32 is why it wasn't a nightmare, took a few breaks and wore the magnifiers. Used super-pointy (tech term) tweezers and an old airbrush needle to thread them through buckles.Those look great, we'll done. I hear ya about the eyes, me too. Besides that, how hard were they to put together? A real pain in the a$$, or not to bad?
You did a crazy excellent job on the instrument panels. I don't think I could do all those individual tiny decals. I think it looks great!Dashboard or instrument panel time.
I was really leaning towards the decals behind the clear plastic method, seems logical that it would look more like the real thing. But in reality, I decided on the other approach after applying just a few decals.
Problems with using the clear part versus the opaque:
This is what I mean about the printing being on the wrong side, the high-resolution printed side is up as in normal decals. But these are required to go behind the clear, so they would NOT stick, I spent 20 minutes working on one pod of 4 dials, using micro-set and micro-sol as adhesive. I set it down carefully to dry and it looks like it slipped a bit. It could also be caused by the deep recess, but depending on the angle of viewing they look like they are skewed to one side or the other. The thick (according to scale, it is really thin) plastic also made the gauges look darker. It will be hard to see inside the cockpit and underneath the hood anyway.
- This one I blame on the manufacturer, but the decals had the adhesive on the wrong side
- As a result getting them aligned perfectly was nearly impossible, at least extremely fiddly
- The thickness of the thin clear plastic makes the gauge faces dark and too recessed
View attachment 129259
I think the visibility of the gauges when applied on top of an opaque/painted surface are just so much better, that alone decides it for me.
View attachment 129258
This is after applying a blob of gloss to each face, still need to chrome some screws that will probably not be visible. Along with a reminder how small this is to begin with, 1/32 sounds large, but theBf109 was a small aircraft.
View attachment 129260
That was the best paint I've used in all of my years modeling. They airbrush extremely well and are fantastic. Unfortunately they have been discontinued for some knucklehead reason.At my age, with failing eyesight, I have no time to spend fighting with fit, more than what should always be expected. If that means spending more money, so be it, but this kit cost less than or no more than the 1/32 Corsair and 1/48 F-4B from Tamiya.
I'm hoping this complexity with so many details and the large assembly manual will help me slow down.
My decision for now is...do I use my old RLM colors in enamel with the acrylic wash?
View attachment 126882
Cool, excellent info. PanthermanEdbert, after a fast email exchange with a friend of mine who's a real Me 109 fan I have what could be the answer to your doubt about those red and black lines.
They are the 2 ways ducts to the supplementary oil tank the Gustavs had behind the spinner. They were originally rubber (black) or metal. The colours in the pic you published are a consequence of the modern tubes used in refitting the engine.
Some pics here below
View attachment 129750View attachment 129751View attachment 129752
Andrea